<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The real revolution of new media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogworldexpo.com/blog/2007/01/21/the-real-revolution-of-new-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogworldexpo.com/blog/2007/01/21/the-real-revolution-of-new-media/</link>
	<description>Blogosphere's Biggest Blogging Conference</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Calvert</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworldexpo.com/blog/2007/01/21/the-real-revolution-of-new-media/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Calvert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogworldexpo.com/blog/2007/01/21/the-real-revolution-of-new-media/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment and for saying it much better than I did Jennifer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment and for saying it much better than I did Jennifer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer FAder</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworldexpo.com/blog/2007/01/21/the-real-revolution-of-new-media/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer FAder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 06:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogworldexpo.com/blog/2007/01/21/the-real-revolution-of-new-media/#comment-269</guid>
		<description>I agree - it's the reduction in the cost of entry/lowered cost of production that's fostered the revolution. The connotation of the word "social" has dilluted the focus of most recent dbates. Media has always been social; what's new is the lowered barriers to entry and the implosion of the gatekeepers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree - it&#8217;s the reduction in the cost of entry/lowered cost of production that&#8217;s fostered the revolution. The connotation of the word &#8220;social&#8221; has dilluted the focus of most recent dbates. Media has always been social; what&#8217;s new is the lowered barriers to entry and the implosion of the gatekeepers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Heuer</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworldexpo.com/blog/2007/01/21/the-real-revolution-of-new-media/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Heuer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogworldexpo.com/blog/2007/01/21/the-real-revolution-of-new-media/#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Good job in peeling back the layers of this onion - I agree with you and think my original statement still jives with that.  From my perspective, being a part of the conversation means having your voice be heard, but you are right to focus on that specific benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job in peeling back the layers of this onion - I agree with you and think my original statement still jives with that.  From my perspective, being a part of the conversation means having your voice be heard, but you are right to focus on that specific benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
